Home
Australian Stock Ex.
Frankfurt Stock Exch.
Hong Kong Stock Ex.
London Stock Exch.
NASDAQ
New York Stock Ex.
Tokyo Stock Exch.
Toronto Stock Exch.
Asset Allocation
Beginners Guide
Best Market Blogs
Books About Buffett
Bull & Bear Markets
Dividends
Elliott Wave Theory
Ethical Investment
Favourite Sites
Financial Writers
Free E-Books
Investment Trusts
Latest Market News
Learn To Trade
Market Club
Risk Analysis
Site Blog
Stockbrokers
Stock Exchange Info
Stock Exch. Secrets?
Stock Trading
Top 10 Exchanges
Value Investing
Virtual Stock Exch.
Your Stock Tips
Your Website?
Warning

XML RSS
What is this?
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Add to Google

Stock Exchange Regulations And The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The stock exchange scandals and revelations of accounting and financial irregularities, caused the passage of the Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002. This is often referred to as the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 after the legislators who sponsored it.

This legislation sought to improve the accuracy of financial statements and to ensure full disclosure of information. It also created an oversight board for accounting practices and strengthened the independence of public accounting firms in their auditing activities.

Other features were increased corporate responsibility for the accuracy of financial statements, to protect the objectivity of securities analysts and improve the SEC’s resources and oversight functions.

As the accounting fraud scandals were occurring, the role of stock analysts came under great scrutiny. These analysts worked for investment banks and issued research reports about stocks along with recommendations to buy, hold, or sell. Curiously, even after Enron executives admitted to accounting fraud, most stock analysts retained a buy recommendation for the company.

As you might imagine, this causes further embarrassment to the financial services industry and reputation of the stock exchange as a whole.

The fact that few analysts issued sell recommendations during the bear market led the New York attorney general to conduct an investigation. Most Wall Street firms and investment banks came under the New York attorney general’s jurisdiction because they were based in New York City.

The investigation led to the discovery of e-mails and other evidence showing conflicts of interest. Analysts gave favorable recommendations to companies that were clients or potential clients of their investment banks.

Privately these analysts had disparaged or even ridiculed the stock value of certain companies, while publicly they had recommended the stocks in an effort to win investment-banking business.

In 2003, in a settlement with the New York attorney general’s office and the SEC, ten of the nation’s leading investment banks agreed to pay a total of $1.4 billion in fines and to change certain practices. The settlement established a $432.5 million fund to provide independent stock research for investors. Two stock analysts were barred from the industry for life and fined a total of $20 million.

Would you like to learn more about trading? You would? Great! Then please click here for an excellent free online trading movie

Would your profits improve with help from a reliable market advice service? If they would, please click here

To learn more background information about stock exchanges, please visit:

Stock Exchange Information

Stock Exchanges And National Economies

The Secondary Market

Stockholders And The Stock Exchange

Investment Institutions On The Stock Exchange

Executing A Trade On The Stock Exchange

Stock Exchange Scandals

Stock Exchange Investment

Learn About The Important Role Of Stock Rating Agencies